it was self-defense. it makes no sense to us and if you try to divorce yourself of passion, but the prosecutor said it right, you reverse the roles, nobody is going to stay -- this is where i agree with mark. it was jury selection that the case was won or lost, unfortunately, because nobody took the perspective of trayvon martin that he was fighting for his life, that he went to his grave not knowing who was this strange, creepy man following him. >> the jurors near the end of the dell ratia liberations aske clarification on manslaughter and the judge said read the document again. if you want clarification, you got to ask specific questions. the jurors apparently never came back with a specific question and as a result may have been confused. jeffrey, go ahead. >> this under lines a real problem with the legal system, which is that jury instructions as a rule are often incomprehensible to ordinary people. i mean, you read these words, the reasonable, intention, you know, double triple negatives in the sam